NEW LAUNCHES

The latest features, products & partnerships in AI

GOVERNMENT

Law, regulation, defense, pilot programs & politics

IMPLEMENTATION

Announcements, strategies & case studies

IN OTHER NEWS

Compelling stories beyond the usual categories

Swap your to-do list for Motion the best AI calendar out there

Motion analyzes your commitments + tasks and automatically creates a schedule that maximizes your time. Try streamlining you schedule with Motion.

What’s happening in AI right now

AI warfare evolution shapes military's next chapter

The battlefields of tomorrow are being shaped by technologies arriving faster than military doctrine can adapt. Several developments highlight a critical inflection point where AI capabilities are significantly outpacing our readiness to deploy them safely and effectively.

The rise of autonomous combat

A growing body of evidence suggests AI-powered drones may render conventional military tactics obsolete, much like guerrilla warfare disrupted British forces during the Revolutionary War. This transformation isn't merely theoretical. American manufacturer Ascent AeroSystems is now challenging DJI's dominance with HELIUS, a sub-250-gram AI-powered drone that meets NDAA compliance requirements for government procurement.

Meanwhile, Air Force engineer Randall Pietersen is developing a drone-based system combining hyperspectral imaging with machine learning to detect unexploded munitions and enhance airfield assessments. This technology could eventually expand into civilian applications including agriculture and infrastructure inspection.

Troubling signs of AI bias

As AI systems become more integrated into national security operations, researchers from CSIS and Scale have discovered a concerning trend: foundation models demonstrate a systematic bias toward escalation rather than diplomatic solutions in international crises. This bias, which varies across models and is particularly pronounced when simulating certain Western leaders, raises serious questions about AI's role in military decision-making.

The implications align with what AI safety experts have long warned about the unintended consequences of models trained on data that may reflect historical biases.

Gaps in collaborative AI development

While individual nations race to develop military AI capabilities, a critical weakness is emerging: incompatible AI systems could hinder joint military operations among allies. This fragmentation threatens the interoperability that modern coalitions depend on for effective defense.

The challenge reflects a broader issue in the US-China AI race, where America faces disadvantages in aging power infrastructure, limited domestic hardware production, and workforce skills gaps. Successfully addressing these shortcomings will require coordinated federal leadership and strategic investments.

Organizations often fail to recognize the capabilities already present within their systems. Nations might similarly overlook the collective power of aligned AI development efforts in favor of siloed approaches that ultimately prove less effective.

Nobel-level AI on the horizon

Perhaps most strikingly, Anthropic now predicts that AI systems matching Nobel laureate-level intellect could arrive by 2027. The company recommends establishing classified communication channels between AI developers and the U.S. government, modernizing economic data collection, and investing in major infrastructure initiatives to prepare for this new reality.

Risks and rewards

Military organizations are trying to hire AI to perform several critical functions: enhance battlefield awareness, make faster decisions, reduce risk to human personnel, and maintain technological superiority over adversaries. The systems being developed today are attempting to fulfill these jobs, but with varying degrees of success and significant unintended consequences.

What becomes clear is that the military needs to employ AI not just for battlefield superiority, but for circumstances where existing approaches fail. Finding unexploded munitions, coordinating allied forces with incompatible systems, and countering adversarial AI all represent such moments.

The coming years will determine whether military organizations can successfully integrate AI into their operations while managing its risks. The path forward requires not just technological innovation but thoughtful doctrine development and international cooperation. Without that balance, we risk creating systems that solve immediate problems while perhaps generating far greater long-term challenges.

We publish daily research, playbooks, and deep industry data breakdowns. Learn More Here

How'd you like today's issue?

Have any feedback to help us improve? We'd love to hear it!

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found