In partnership with
Quick, hard-hitting business news.
Morning Brew was built on a simple idea: business news doesn’t have to be boring.
Today, it’s the fastest-growing newsletter in the country with over 4.2 million readers—thanks to a format that makes staying informed both easy and enjoyable.
Each morning, Morning Brew delivers the day’s biggest stories—from Wall Street to Silicon Valley and beyond—in bite-sized reads packed with facts, not fluff, and just enough wit to keep things interesting.
Try the newsletter for free and see why busy professionals are ditching jargon-heavy, traditional business media for a smarter, faster way to stay in the loop.
Daily deep dives
🤖 A 19-year-old entrepreneur is teaching robots to feel—not literally, but through AI models that simulate human physiological responses like heart rate changes and temperature fluctuations when experiencing emotions. Teddy Warner's startup Intempus argues that robots need this "middle step" between observation and action to interact naturally with humans, using polygraph test data to create artificial emotional states. The approach challenges conventional robotics by suggesting machines need simulated bodily functions to bridge the uncanny valley, with seven partners already testing these "feeling robots." While the technology raises philosophical questions about whether robots can truly experience emotions or merely mimic them, Warner's vision represents a provocative attempt to make human-robot interaction less mechanical and more intuitive.
🚀 DeepSeek's latest model is rewriting the rules of AI competition, achieving an 87.5% accuracy on complex reasoning tests while spending just $5.58 million on training—a fraction of what Western competitors typically invest. The Chinese startup's R1-0528 model not only rivals offerings from OpenAI and Google in performance but does so with an open-source MIT license, allowing anyone to freely use and modify the technology. This combination of competitive performance, transparent licensing, and cost-efficient development represents more than technical achievement—it's a strategic challenge to the concentrated power of current AI leaders. As DeepSeek demonstrates that world-class AI can be built faster and cheaper outside Silicon Valley, the industry faces a fundamental question about who will control the future of artificial intelligence.
🗣️ ElevenLabs' new voice AI analyzes your "ums" and "ahs" to create conversations that feel genuinely human, marking a sophisticated leap in how AI agents interact with people. The Conversational AI 2.0 platform, released just five months after its predecessor, combines natural turn-taking capabilities with enterprise-grade features like integrated knowledge retrieval and batch calling systems. By enabling agents to seamlessly switch between languages mid-conversation and access specific knowledge bases with minimal latency, ElevenLabs addresses critical limitations that have kept voice AI from widespread enterprise adoption. The platform's multimodal support—allowing single agents to handle both text and voice interactions—signals a shift toward more unified and efficient AI communication systems that could reshape customer service operations across industries.
🔌 Anthropic's Model Context Protocol promises to eliminate the "integration tax" that organizations pay when connecting AI systems to their tech stacks, offering a standardized framework similar to what REST did for web services. The open-source protocol creates a universal language for AI models to discover and interact with external tools, potentially transforming weeks of custom integration work into plug-and-play connections. However, MCP faces the classic chicken-and-egg problem of standards adoption—without multi-vendor governance or backing from other major AI players, it risks becoming just another proprietary interface rather than the industry standard it aspires to be. Organizations are advised to prototype with MCP while maintaining architectural flexibility, as the battle for AI integration standards is just beginning and the ultimate winner remains uncertain.
🧠 AI therapy in Ukrainian war zones achieved 30-35% anxiety reduction compared to 45-50% for human therapists, revealing both the promise and limitations of digital mental health support in crisis settings. The randomized trial with 104 women found that while the Friend chatbot's 24/7 availability and cognitive behavioral techniques provided meaningful relief, it couldn't match the healing power of human connection—what researchers called the "empathy gap." This real-world test under extreme conditions suggests AI's most valuable role may be as a scalable supplement when human therapists are unavailable, not as a replacement for authentic therapeutic relationships. As humanitarian crises strain mental health resources globally, the findings point toward hybrid models where AI extends human care rather than attempting to replicate it entirely.
🎓 Nearly 80% of business schools have overhauled their programs to prepare executives for the AI era, but they're taking a surprising approach—focusing on strategic thinking over coding skills. Leading institutions are experimenting with unconventional methods, from ESCP Business School using AI-generated art to break rigid thinking patterns to Iese deploying AI negotiation platforms that sharpen emotional intelligence alongside technical understanding. This educational transformation reflects a crucial shift in executive priorities: understanding AI's "black box" well enough to make responsible decisions rather than blindly delegating to machines. As one ON Semiconductor executive noted, this strategic AI fluency is already driving real product development changes, suggesting that tomorrow's business leaders will need to master the art of thinking alongside machines rather than simply operating them.
📊 An AI engineer's framework bridges the chasm between daily AI breakthroughs and yearly economic data, offering economists real-time "handles" to grasp technology's economic impact. The approach tracks implementation projects from capability release to production deployment—typically under a year—revealing that implementation speed directly reflects return on investment potential. This granular view exposes what aggregate statistics miss: which specific AI advances drive economic value versus merely impressing technologists. The engineer's prediction of sharply increased software developer demand within two years suggests these implementation patterns are already signaling major economic shifts that traditional metrics won't capture until it's too late for strategic positioning.
