• CO/AI
  • Posts
  • The AI Ethics War Begins 🏛

The AI Ethics War Begins 🏛

Welcome to CO/AI

We slow AI down so you can speed up

Our mission is to make 1,000,000 people AI Literate

Aiming to break down complex subjects into digestible takeaways. The newsletter for people who don’t know where to start.

Today’s Letter:

AI Model Development + Democracy? (4 min)

Anthropic's Democratic Experiment with AI; by drafting a constitution through public input from ~1,000 Americans, to the create a new AI system trained on these democratic values and preferences.

The Big Picture :

  • Democratic AI Development: Anthropic's (an AI model provider) undertook an initiative to translate public opinions into actionable principles for training an AI system.

  • Public Input Process: Utilizing the Polis platform, the project engaged a diverse cross-section of the American public, yielding over 1,000 contributions and 38,252 votes on AI governance principles.

  • Constitutional AI: The publicly sourced constitution reveals significant alignment—and notable divergences—with Anthropic's own internal constitution, emphasizing objectivity, accessibility, and the promotion of desired behaviors.

Why It Matters:

  • Transparency and Inclusion: This experiment highlights the importance of transparency in AI development and the potential for broader public inclusion in shaping AI's normative values.

  • Shifting the Paradigm: By actively involving the public in AI's ethical framework, Anthropic challenges the traditional developer-centric model of AI governance, proposing a more democratic alternative.

  • Evolving AI Ethics: The differences between the public and internal constitutions shed light on the evolving nature of societal expectations for AI, emphasizing the need for systems that are objective, accessible, and impartial.

What Do You think?

In the Spirit of Constitutional AI

Is This a Viable Way to Address AI Ethics Concerns ?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Thinking Critically:

  • Representation At Scale: While the project marks a significant step towards democratic AI, questions remain about the scalability of such approaches and the representativeness of the input process.

  • Technical Challenges: Training AI models to adhere to democratically sourced principles presents unique challenges, from interpreting public input to adjusting training methodologies to reflect these inputs accurately.

  • Future Implications: The experiment opens up discussions on the feasibility and desirability of democratizing AI governance on a larger scale, considering the technical, ethical, and logistical hurdles involved.

Looking Ahead: 🔭

  • Navigating Public Opinion: Anthropic's experience underscores the complexity of translating public opinions into actionable principles for AI training, highlighting the necessity of clear guidelines and the potential for subjective interpretation.

  • Model Training Insights: Despite initial challenges, the training of AI models based on the public constitution showed promising results, including reduced biases and similar performance to standard models on various tasks.

  • The Road Ahead: This experiment sets the stage for further exploration into democratic AI development, suggesting areas for improvement in public engagement, model training, and evaluation methodologies.

Read The Full Paper Here:

Reply

or to participate.