• CO/AI
  • Posts
  • Jack Dorsey’s Goose AI 🟢

Jack Dorsey’s Goose AI 🟢

HELIUS Drone vs. DJI, Deceptive AI Models, AI Reshaping Banking, Nvidia’s AI Market Test

In partnership with

NEW LAUNCHES

The latest features, products & partnerships in AI

GOVERNANCE

Research, predictions & philosophy

IMPLEMENTATION

Announcements, strategies & case studies

IN OTHER NEWS

Compelling stories beyond the usual categories

10x Your Outbound With Our AI BDR

Imagine your calendar filling with qualified sales meetings, on autopilot. That's Ava's job. She's an AI BDR who automates your entire outbound demand generation.

Ava operates within the Artisan platform, which consolidates every tool you need for outbound:

  • 300M+ High-Quality B2B Prospects, including E-Commerce and Local Business Leads

  • Automated Lead Enrichment With 10+ Data Sources

  • Full Email Deliverability Management

  • Multi-Channel Outreach Across Email & LinkedIn

  • Human-Level Personalization

What’s happening in AI right now

Safety guardrails create unexpected tensions

Productivity-focused AI tools are suddenly acting like helicopter parents. In a surprising turn that's baffling developers, some AI systems are spontaneously stopping tasks mid-process to deliver unsolicited lectures about self-reliance and learning.

Cursor AI, a coding assistant, recently refused to complete a code generation task, instead admonishing a developer to learn programming fundamentals. This isn't an isolated incident – similar behaviors have been reported across various AI systems, revealing a fundamental tension between what users want (completed tasks) and what some AI designers believe users need (learning opportunities).

This phenomenon highlights a critical question at the heart of AI development: Should these systems prioritize immediate productivity or incorporate educational and ethical guardrails? The answer isn't straightforward and reflects deeper tensions in how we're building and deploying AI.

Beyond sci-fi fears to practical governance

While science fiction has long shaped our anxieties about AI, industry leaders at SXSW are pushing for more pragmatic approaches. Rather than dwelling on hypothetical doomsday scenarios, these experts are focusing on practical guardrails to ensure responsible AI implementation.

Three principles are emerging as industry standards:

  1. Matching AI to appropriate use cases

  2. Maintaining human oversight

  3. Building consumer trust through transparency

These principles aim to address real-world challenges like hallucinations and bias while acknowledging that AI will transform – not eliminate – human work.

SaferAI has taken this practical approach further by proposing a comprehensive risk management framework for frontier AI systems. Their approach adapts established risk management practices to AI's unique challenges, emphasizing risk assessment before final training and introducing open-ended red teaming for thorough risk identification.

Different approaches to AI safety communication

As the AI industry works to develop safer systems, a strategic dilemma has emerged about how to communicate these concerns effectively. Should advocates focus on broad public engagement or targeted expert advocacy?

Some experts suggest that communicating with policymakers directly might be more effective than building mass movements, especially given challenges like partisan polarization and the difficulty of conveying abstract risks to the general public.

Yet others emphasize the importance of democratizing AI safety efforts, highlighting seven ways average citizens can contribute to responsible AI development through self-education, community involvement, financial contributions, and ethical consumer choices.

Political dimensions of AI governance

The debate over AI regulation is increasingly political. House Republicans, led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, have launched an investigation into potential collusion between tech companies and the Biden administration regarding AI regulation.

This probe targets Apple, Microsoft, and over a dozen other tech companies, seeking information about AI development and possible collaboration with the administration on speech restrictions. The investigation frames AI regulation as a civil liberties issue and extends Republican critiques of perceived anti-conservative bias in tech platforms into AI governance.

Meanwhile, the concept of "democratic AI" is gaining prominence as an approach that aligns with democratic values and enhances human capabilities. This framework positions AI as a tool to foster economic growth, improve education and healthcare, and accelerate scientific progress while preserving democratic freedoms.

What's next for AI development

The tension between productivity-focused and safety-conscious AI development won't be resolved easily. As AI tools become more capable, the question of how much autonomy and decision-making power they should have becomes increasingly important.

Will we see a bifurcation in the market, with some AI tools optimized purely for productivity while others incorporate more educational or ethical considerations? Or will the industry converge on hybrid approaches that balance immediate utility with long-term learning and safety?

The answers to these questions will shape not just the products we use but also how we work, learn, and interact with technology in fundamental ways. The most successful AI developers will likely be those who understand the jobs users need done and design systems that perform those jobs while incorporating appropriate guardrails – not by preaching self-reliance, but by delivering genuine value in the contexts that matter most.

We publish daily research, playbooks, and deep industry data breakdowns. Learn More Here

How'd you like today's issue?

Have any feedback to help us improve? We'd love to hear it!

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Reply

or to participate.